Endnotes

KJVO Debate Sources and End Notes

End-notes with live video links and sources....

END-NOTES for 'The King James Only Debate'

BUY BOOK HERE! We need your support please GIVE here.

LIVE ONLINE END-NOTES! This book has the unique feature of providing all sources and end-notes within an online platform by offering live verifiable links right here. This title is truly the first book to offer such an experience. Let this book come alive for you with just the click of your mouse to enhance your learning on this great topic. These live end-notes are extensive and if you find a statement that lacks a source, or you believe any source is in need of correction, please detail your reasoning and contact us via email at https://kjvdebate.com/contact

This author mas made every attempt to note all sources, but due to the extensive content and some quotes known by memory, we leave the title as 'open source' for readers (and critics) to contact us for any source content corrections that may need to be made.

Source material may or may not reflect the beliefs of Write the Vision Ministries! The source material provided does not mean we believe all of what each source believes and/or of all their writings. Our beliefs are here at https://kjvdebate.com/beliefs-1

Introduction

1. II Timothy 4:14; I Timothy 1:20; II Timothy 2:17 (KJV).

1a. [Intro] I John 5:7 debate challenge to scholars on the originality of the Comma in the TR/KJV

1b. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PSV72Tjy8g&t=1s

1c. Phillip Schaff: The Ecumenical Enigma

2. Westcott & Hort: Translator's Beliefs (jesusisprecious.org) See also Westcott & Hort: their heresies and occult activities (sociedadrvg.com)

3. Burgon, “The Revision Revised: A Refutation of Westcott and Hort’s False Greek Text and Theory” (1883); (p. XV).

4. https://store.kjv1611.org/the-scholarship-only-controversy/

5.https://www.babbel.com/en/magazine/how-many-people-speak-hebrew

6. https://www.str.org/w/remember-that-first-century-mark-fragment-

6a. https://www.amazon.com/Ecclesiastical-Text-Criticism-Biblical-Authority/dp/0996748296 (p. 247).

7. Pinto’s ‘Bridge to Babylon’ series. https://www.amazon.com/Bridge-Babylon-Rome-Ecumenism-Bible/dp/B01LQ9WA2O/

8. https://ehrmanblog.org/finally-now-we-know-the-first-century-copy-of-mark/

9. Wallace’s reconstruction of Mark 8:22 https://danielbwallace.com/2020/09/01/new-discoveries-on-every-page-p45-p46-p47/

9b. https://www.aomin.org/aoblog/king-james-onlyism/8-reasons-why-it-is-fallacious-for-kjvo-advocates-to-invoke-the-majority-rule/

10. White vs. Riddle debate on Eph 3:9 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q05oQTiTfe4

10a. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxf_EhjZd5Y

10b. See chapter ten.

10c. Nestle-Aland 27th Edition Greek New Testament

11. ‘Is the World’s Oldest Bible a fake’? David Daniels: Sept 15, 2020, Chick Publications. https://www.amazon.com/Worlds-Oldest-Bible-Fake/dp/075891170X

12. Steven Avery has documentation regarding this controversy at Revisiting the Date of Codex Sinaiticus - Brent Nongbri | Pure Bible Forum

13. Dr. Jeff Riddle vs. Dr. James White | Textus Receptus vs. Critical Text DEBATE | Eph 3:9

14. https://youtu.be/lMLCM9ULM14?si=565J-fXRoXN20twf&t=3219

15. L. Vance: ‘King James, His Bible, and it’s Translators’ (2016, pp.261-269). The KJVO movement started with King James in 1611 and has been around for centuries! God Will Keep It! The 400 Year History of the King James Bible Only Movement Faust, Joey

16. Texe Marrs interviewing Dr. Ruckman at the 35:00 mark; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rt9p_EqF3k

16a. https://www.amazon.com/Ecclesiastical-Text-Criticism-Biblical-Authority/dp/0996748296 (Letis comments on Dr. White).

17. [PART 1] I John 5:7 debate challenge to scholars on the originality of the J.C. in the TR/KJV

Chapter One: "The King James Advantage"

1. During my 2 years at Bible College in 84-85, the KJV Bible was demoted in favor of all the modern versions.

1a. John Owen (1616-1683)

1b. The reason of faith (1677) John Owen

2. Muslim’s use James White’s own arguments here at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYkPn2aXKds also BART EHRMAN ON THE NEW TESTAMENT

3. This video was censored and deleted!

3a. Sola scriptura

3b. https://youtu.be/ehnEZtqj2Mo?t=1309

3c. The TCC and Psalm 12:6-7 – StandardSacredText.com

4. Gesenius' Hebrew grammar : Gesenius, Wilhelm, 1786-1842

4a. Knowing in your heart the truth about the KJV Bible is not a textual issue but rather a spiritual issue of which faith and discernment is the primary ingredient. One must ask an honest question here. When you hear the scholars and the critics say that 'no translation can be perfect, for only the originals are faithful,' we must ask of whom did they hear this from, God or man?

4b. Bridge To Babylon: Rome, Ecumenism & The Bible

4c. Theodore P. Letis: Lecture on the English Standard Version

5. Please search for this specific DL episode on YouTube with this statement, I could not find it.

6. https://youtu.be/00BhJeUGmvw?t=4953

7. John Burgon (1813-1888)

8. The Revision Revised by: Dean Burgon

Chapter Two: "Missing Verses and Words"

1. When a Bible critic says, “I want to know what the Apostles wrote,” it is because they don't believe that there is any perfect Bible in the world today that says exactly ‘what the Apostles wrote.’ KJV believers by faith know exactly ‘what the Apostles wrote’ (Rom 15:4).

1a. When Did Moses Write the Book of Genesis?

1b. Watchtower Announcement

1c. Age of Enlightenment

1d. Darwin's 'On the Origin of Species' was published in 1859, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Origin_of_Species within the same time Tischendorf was shown Codex Sinaiticus on a 3rd visit to St. Catherine's in Sinai. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Sinaiticus

2. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Bezae Most scholars are aware of the difference between Jerome's Latin Vulgate and the Old Latin but rarely mention it.

3. https://cudl.lib.cam.ac.uk/view/MS-NN-00002-00041/1

3a. I John 5:7 and the 1st Century Latin/Spain Connection: Intro to Paul's Vision for Spain

4. Isaiah 30:20-21.

5. New Testament Greek

6. Already Gone | Answers in Genesis

7. An Interview on the Tree of Life Bible

7a. If His name was Yeshua, why do we call Him Jesus?

8. 'Father' and 'Son' Removed From Bible Translations for Muslims

8a. Why we don't need Preservation (WOW)!

9. B.B. Warfield Essays (p.2072).

Chapter Three: "Attacks on Doctrine"

a. Smith, George Vance (1816-1902)

b. Texts and margins of the Revised New Testament affecting theological doctrine Smith, George Vance, 1816-1902

1. Jesus said “Ye shall know them by their fruits” (Matt 7:15-20). Any man or ministry must produce the good fruits of faith and belief in the Word of God rather than doubts, questions, and unbelief (Heb 11:1-7; I Tim 1:4).

2. Why We Should Not Passover Easter - Nick Sayers

2a. The King James Bible Translators

2b. Can The End Of Mark's Gospel Be Trusted?

2c. Early Evidence for Mark 16:9-20

3. Defense of the Pericope Adulterae by Dr. Edward Hills - Confessional Bibliology

4. J. A. Alexander Books | Banner of Truth - Scholar, Dr. J. A. Alexander (1809 – 1860), on Acts (2 vols. Acts 8:37-38 pp.349-350).

4a. Is the World's Oldest Bible a Fake?

4b. Read the New Revised Standard w/ Apocrypha

5. The originals came from Antioch and the cities of which the Paul traveled, not in Egypt. "And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch" (Acts 11:26).

5a. I John 5:7 debate challenge to scholars on the originality of the Comma in the TR/KJV

6. A plain introduction to the criticism of the New Testament (Scrivener) p.403.

6a. Reconsidering the relationship between the Complutensian Polyglot & Erasmus

6b. 1 John 5:7, the 1514 Complutension Polyglot, and its Detractors – Standard Sacred Text.com

6c. Does 1 John 5:7 belong in the Bible?

6d. The Ximenez Polyglot

6e. Cardinal Ximenes with an account of the Complutensian polyglot

6f. Demetrius Ducas (1480-1527)

6g. Doukas and the N.T. Text of the Polyglot

7. Should 1 John 5:7 be in the Bible? Ankerberg interview with Dr. Wallace.

7a. Erasmus of Christendom : Bainton, Roland H. (Roland Herbert), 1894-1984

7b. A History Of The Debate Over 1 John 5,7-8 by Michael Maynard

8. The text of the New Testament : its transmission, corruption, and restoration : Metzger, Bruce M

8a. Is 1 John 5:7 as it is worded in the KJV correct?

8b. 1 John 5:7 - Is Codex Montfortianus Codex Britannicus?

9. Evangelical Textual Criticism: The Greek Manuscripts of the Comma Johanneum (1 John 5:7–8)

9a. Desiderius Erasmus | Catholic Answers

9b. Adam Clarke (1762-1832)

10. A new plea for the authenticity of the text of the three heavenly witnesses, or, Porson's letters to Travis eclectically examined : and the external and internal evidences for 1 John V.7 eclectically re-surveyed : Forster, Charles, -1871

10a. Erasmus And The Manuscripts He Used - Dr. Steve Combs

11. Jerome, Letter to Pope Damasus: Beginning of the Preface to the Gospels

11a. CHURCH FATHERS: Augustine to Jerome (A.D. 403)

12. New Evidence for I John 5:7 in the Old Latin La Cava Bible!

13. Roman Catholic and Protestant Bibles compared Jacobus, Melancthon Williams, 1855-1937

14. Text-Critical Symbols in Vaticanus

14a. Vaticanus_Umlauts

14b. Evangelical Textual Criticism: Snapp on the Distigmai in Vaticanus with my rebuttal at Scholars fear those dots in Vaticanus (kjvdebate.com)

14c. The Text of the Gospels: Search results for umlauts

14d. Evangelical Textual Criticism: Snapp on the Distigmai in Vaticanus

14e. An inquiry into the integrity of the Greek Vulgate : or, Received text of the New Testament : Nolan, Frederick, 1784-1864

14f. Codex Vaticanus: Is It Oldest and Best? No login required just click out X

14g. Did the Original Scribes Write the Distigmai in Codex Vaticanus?

15. CHURCH FATHERS: Treatise 1 (Cyprian of Carthage)

16. Boyce is a follower of White and has converted to Roman Catholicism. Although these men may be well intentioned, we recommend Bible believers avoid those whose teachings cast doubts on the infallibility of the word of God in our day (Rom 16:17).

16a. I John 5:7 debate challenge to scholars on the originality of verse 7 in the TR/KJB.

16b. Mike Ferrando's 1500 Years of Witnesses for I John 5:7

17. An inquiry into the integrity of the Greek Vulgate or Received text of the New Testament

18. Victor of Vita: History of the Vandal Persecution by Victor Vitensis

19. Evidence of the Divine Hand on True Scripture: Bednar, Dr. L:

19a. http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/apocjn.html

19b. SACRA SCRIPTA 1_2012

19c. The 1904 Historic Greek Orthodox Text has I John 5:7 (Link taken down)

20. A new plea for the authenticity of the text of the three heavenly witnesses

20a. The Comma Johanneum Defended

21. The readings of the modern versions are so absurd that even Mr. White, who is certainly no friend of the KJV, once said that "there is much to be said in defense of the KJV rendering" (I Tim 3:16) and that he "prefer[s] this reading and feel[s] that it has more than sufficient support among the Greek manuscripts.” Mr. White may have changed his mine today however.

22. The Greek New Testament According To Family 35, Wilbur N. Pickering

23. Daniel 3:25—“the Son of God,” or “a son of the gods”?

Chapter Four: "Answering the Critics"

1. https://www.youtube.com/user/CAnswersTV/featured

1a. Center for New Testament Restoration (greekcntr.org)

2. https://w3techs.com/technologies/history_overview/content_language/ms/y (English has continued to climb since this chart was created)

3. https://www.languagecomparison.com/en/how-many-people-speak-greek-and-hebrew/comparison-20-35-7 (13 million Greek speakers and 9 million Hebrew speakers as of June 2022)

4. Although I do not agree with this authors views on the Cambridge vs. Oxford fallacy, a list of spelling updates is available here: https://www.bibleprotector.com/400yearsKJBeditions.pdf

4a. 1769 Oxford Standardized Revision of the 1611 King James Bible Facsimile Reproduction (thekjvstore.com)

4b. 1611 KJV Marginal Notes = Modern Version Textual Footnotes? James White Thomas Ross Debate

4c. The King James Version Defended: Edward Hills

5. Acts 12:4 controversy: https://youtu.be/R_rtLmClXmg

6. Snapp fails to mention that Beza corrected the reading to 'her.' https://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2022/04/luke-222-his-or-their.html See also Luke 2:22 "her" purification or "their" purification? Reformation text versus the modern Vatican Versions.

6a. A translation of the four Gospels from the Syriac of the Sinaitic palimpsest:

7. Boyce in his debate with Riddle on May 19, 2020, or with Josh Gibbs or Jonathan Sheffield. This may be the actual video here at https://youtu.be/-RkxlW9cP0U?t=1975 Contact Dr. Boyce for the exact location.

7a. Before Martin Luther, there was Erasmus – a Dutch theologian who paved the way for the Protestant Reformation (theconversation.com)

7b. Being that scholars and Bible critics do not believe they have a perfect Bible in our day, they don’t want us KJV believers to have one either. Not only were the KJV translators honest in placing the words in italics (unlike many modern versions), but they were given the understanding, knowledge, wisdom, and direction in translating the Hebrew and Greek meanings into a readable English format, for “there is a spirt in man, and the inspiration of the Almighty giveth them understanding” (Job 32:8). The fact is that a number of Old Testament Italicized words are quoted in The New Testament without the Italics. This means the italicized Old Testament word that was not in the Hebrew (at least not in any existing known Hebrew manuscripts) is later quoted by the Apostles or even Christ Himself of which that same word is in the Greek without italics. This demonstrates the confidence that God places in the Italicized words. Many OT quotes in the New Testament are in the Greek and not italicized when referencing a Hebrew word that is italicized, therefore, it has been there all along and is God's Word, for "every Word of God is pure" (Pro 30:5).

7c. https://youtu.be/pa05VEeM1Bw?si=-FhaiisP8UbTRO_U&t=376

8. A brief review of her book: https://youtu.be/g3eXVIa5lLk

9.You will not find any mention of Vatican authority in authoring the modern versions in the NA28, but it is located in the NA27 on p.45 N/A 27 and then search the NA28 at.... https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U3IUZsIuklf7UnkxUcUmKiN_OytGI2HU/view

10. Footnote 9 on page xv: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/36722/36722-h/36722-h.html

11. https://textusreceptusbibles.com/Based_on_Few_Manuscripts as an introduction. Erika Rummel’s 1986 book Erasmus' Annotations on the New Testament records the following on pages 41-42, "Clearly Erasmus consulted a respectable number of Greek manuscripts over the years. Moreover, Erasmus did not rest content with these findings but, in the years following the publication of his first edition, personally visited a number of libraries, obtained manuscripts on loan, consulted the Aldine and Complutensian editions, and had variants recorded for him by his friends. The copious additions to the Annotations bear witness to his continued research." Claiming Erasmus only had a few manuscripts is a fallacy by the scholars.

11a. Dead Sea Scrolls - academic session

11b. J.D. Michaelis (1717-1791), "Introduction to the New Testament" (p. 261). Vol 1

12. The last 6 verses of Rev: https://textusreceptusbibles.com/Revelation_Textus_Receptus and https://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2019/02/erasmus-manuscript-of-revelation.html

12a. meanest translation?

13. The Septuagint fallacy : an indictment of modern criticism : Phillips, William (1918)

14. Preface to the King James Version 1611

14a. James White & Thomas Ross Debate Review #4: KJV Translators to the Reader & Perfect Preservation

14b. Why Are Unicorns In The Bible? The King James Bible uses the word Unicorn several times. Isn't that a mythical creature? Should the translators have used a different word instead? Login not required just hit X

15. Westcott & Hort: their heresies and occult activities (sociedadrvg.com)

16. Scholars fear those dots in Vaticanus (kjvdebate.com)

17. Rebuttal to James Snapp's shorter ending theory at Matthew 25:13! - YouTube

Chapter Five: "Inspiration and Preservation"

1. White is unable to name any verse that is beyond potential future changes of modern textual criticism in his debate with Dr. Riddle on Oct 3, 2020: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q05oQTiTfe4&t=3900s

2. Since the initial publication of this book in 2018, Dr. White has converted to post-millennialism. He shares his reasoning here: https://www.aomin.org/aoblog/exegesis/max-lucados-apology-for-having-spoken-the-truth-ravi-zacharias-scandal-and-yes-mildred-hes-a-postmillennialist/ at the 1:13:15 mark and following.

3. Codex Vaticanus has as a filler manuscript (GA 1957 from ~15th century: https://digi.vatlib.it/view/MSS_Vat.gr.1209 beginning on page 1519) for the rest of Hebrews and all of Revelation. But nevertheless, it still claims to be a 4th century manuscript of which does not contain the book of Revelation among other missing books. Look here http://www.1611kingjamesbible.com/codex_vaticanus.html/

4. 460 Ancient Bishops vs. 460 Modern Scholars on I John 5:7

5. https://youtu.be/dZgUnuBCh3E

6. John 6:15 information: https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=john.6|version=VarApp&options=GNHVU and https://archive.org/details/novumtestamentu01greggoog/page/n840/mode/2up?view=theater

7. https://youtu.be/tbJ33bxBnWA

7a. The King James Version Defended by Edward F. Hills : Free Download, Borrow, and Streaming : Internet Archive

8. Confessional Bibliology Roundtable: John 1:18 – Son or God? - Text and Translation

8a. The history of the (KJV) Holy Bible is unsurpassably pre-eminent!

9. https://www.aomin.org/aoblog/king-james-onlyism/vaccines-lindsay-kjv-onlyism-roman-catholic-apologetics-arguments/ beginning at 15:00

10. The Byzantine Text-type and New Testament Textual Criticism (1984) by Harry A. Sturz. https://www.amazon.com/Byzantine-Text-Type-Testament-Textual-Criticism/dp/1631998064

The whole key to understanding N.T. textual criticism is not primarily comparing manuscripts, but simple history, geography, and weather. It really only requires understanding some historical and geographic issues and being able to look at maps. (Glenn J. Kerr: “Out of Egypt Have I Called My Son:” Why Evangelicals Should Get Over Their Preoccupation with Egyptian Manuscripts at https://www.baptistboard.com/data/attachment-files/2017/06/2802_12fba0f700b37a34abaf3f523cdf8469.pdf?fbclid=IwAR27xAqfzoKqKu1A-PuzhiySeouT9WoMyNDP1VcC0CQsvCnRC11t9bIyMuM

11. Dan Wallace views here at https://www.biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/gtj/12-1_021.pdf . More at Yes, the Bible Teaches Preservation

11a. Wallace-Inspiration-GTJ

11b. In 1400 A.D., the world's population was only about 350 million souls compared to 8 billion today, and the printing press was invented in 1440. These are several things to consider among many other factors when we ask ourselves, why God would wait until 1611-1769 for a perfect Bible (in book form, not in scattered manuscripts) to come out? Why did God wait 4000 years to send Jesus Christ? God's plans and divine dealings with mankind is not something we can always understand. I like Taylor DeSoto’s characterization of their position, “they don’t have a perfect Bible, so we can’t have one either.” Atlas of world population history: McEvedy, Colin; Jones, Richard: 9780713910315: Amazon.com: Books

12. KJV critics have a hard time understanding the difference between the original inspiration given to the Apostles to author scripture, and the understanding, wisdom, and knowledge given to the KJV translators to translate it. Even as Bezaleel, as the Lord “filled him with the Spirit of God, in wisdom, and in understanding, and in knowledge, and in all manner of workmanship” to work on the Lord’s tabernacle (Exodus 31:1-18). The Spirit of God still works through men as with Bezaleel in 1491 BC, the KJV translators in 1604-1611, and up to our own day in the year 2022.

13. In a recent conversation online with KJV critic Nathan Cravatt, the critical argument was made that " It is impossible to have an exact word for word translation from one language to another. The KJV isn’t even close, nor did they pretend to even try. The original languages are the only possible way for true preservation to happen. God has preserved every single word." My response was, "This begs a question here. From whom did you hear that, from God or man? If God has preserved every word as you said, where are they or where can I go buy a copy"?

14. The Waldenses and the Bible - Historicist.info

15. Boyer was commissioned by King William III of England to write an official history of the Vaudois for his majesty. The history of the Vaudois (1692) Boyer, Pierre

16. Peter Boyer, 'The History of the Vaudois' (London: Three Bibles in St. Paul's Church Yard, 1692), p. 6. The history of the Vaudois (1692 ) Boyer, Pierre

16a. David H. Sorenson, 'Touch Not the Unclean Thing' (2001, pp. 256-261). Touch Not the Unclean Thing

17. Ibid., p. 259

18. J.A. Wylie, 'History of the Waldenses' (London: Cassell & Co., 1860) chapter 10, p. 107.

19. Leger, 'Histoire de Piemont des Eglises Evangeliques' p. 164, 167

20. Frederick Henry Scrivener, 'The New Testament in Greek: According to the Text Followed in the Authorized Version Together with the Variations Adopted in the Revised Version' (London: Cambridge University Press, 1881), vii.

21. David Otis Fuller, 'Which Bible'?, (Grand Rapids Publications, 1970)

21a. VIGILANTIUS, LEADER OF THE WALDENSES (godrules.net)

21b. Pope to Waldensian Church: Forgive us! - YouTube

22. Waldensian History (waldensiantrailoffaith.org)

23. How the Catholic Church Consolidated Power (Claudius of Turin, Part 1) - YouTube

23a. “Sunt in quibus nostra Vulgata magis probatur editio, aut Ambrosiana lectio, quam Graeci Codices. Et tamen consentientibus omnibus Graecis exemplaribus, quoniam illa mutare non licuit Latina accomodavimus, ne non responderent, quum in hoc ipsum adderentur” (Nov. Test. Praef, Basil: Froeben, 1546, p. xi ).

23aa. Scrivener (A Plain Introduction to the Criticism of the New Testament, 2d ed. 1874), 2:43

23b. McClintock and Strong, Encyclopedia, s.v. "Waldenses"

23c. An inquiry into the integrity of the Greek Vulgate or Received text of the New Testament Nolan, Frederick, 1784-1864

23d. https://archive.org/details/a601052600nolauoft/page/n19/mode/2up

23e. Sorenson, 'Touch Not the Unclean Thing' (2001, p. 38).

23f. Westcott and Hort, Introduction to the N.T., p. 143. cf.Hills, The KJV Defended, p. 172.

23g. Bruce M. Metzger, The Early Versions Of The New Testament. Their Origin, Transmission, And Limitations p. 291

23h. The traditional text of the Holy Gospels vindicated and established : Burgon, John William, 1813-1888

23i. ibid, p. 144

23j. ibid, p. 145

24. Bible Translation Discussion | Will Kinney and Dr. Stephen Boyce - King James Only?

25. The Authorized Edition of the English Bible (1611): Its Subsequent Reprints and Modern Representatives: Scrivener, Frederick H.

25a. The text of the New Testament : an introduction to the critical editions and to the theory and practice of modern textual criticism : Aland, Kurt p. 59 (see 25a also below).

25a. Dr. Jeff Riddle vs. Dr. James White on the Eph 3:9 'fellowship' reading with follow up enhancements.

26. Never Return to Egypt | My Jewish Learning

27. CHURCH FATHERS: The Perpetual Virginity of Mary (Jerome)

28. I John 5:7 and the 1st Century Latin/Spain Connection!

29. Anti-Preservationist and Anti-KJV Mystic Manly P. Hall

30. The Doctrine of Preservation

31. Dan Wallace and Wes Huff ignore Preservation! The Truth About the Bible and Early Christianity: Wes Huff, Michael Kruger, Daniel Wallace

32. Theodore P. Letis: Is the King James Bible too hard to read?

33. Is the King James Bible too hard to read? Short answer: NO!

34. The 30 Best Arguments Against King James Version Onlyism: Van Kleeck Jr., Dr. Peter

Chapter Six: "The 'Originals only' Heresy"

a. The Unfound Scriptures

1. Why Do We Not Need the Original Bible Manuscripts? - Updated American Standard Version

2. The KJV translators were well aware of a "Rhinoceros" being a one horned 'UNICORNIS.' “Unicorn” or “Wild oxen?”

2a. One critic said 'What we have is the best guess of a lost generation. Nothing prevents us from doing far better.' I said, 'What a sad and hopeless message to send out to a lost world by telling them God sends us His 'best guesses'." God does not send out 'guesses'! He sends out certainly and assurances regarding His Holy Word.' I Thess 2:13 (KJV). God says He wants us to KNOW, "That I might make thee know the certainty of the words of truth" (Pro 22:21) KJV. Marginal notes are not inspired and are not always correct, but the final text of the KJV is both 100% correct and inspired, for it contains the Scriptures promised by God to be preserved for us in this generation in our time (Psa 12:6-7; II Tim 3:16) KJV. Faith, discernment, and God's Spirit reveals this.

3. CHURCH FATHERS: (Cyprian of Carthage)

4. CHURCH FATHERS: Epistle 72 (Cyprian of Carthage)

4a. The King James Version Defended by Edward F. Hills

5. CHURCH FATHERS: Dialogue with Trypho (Justin Martyr)

6. CHURCH FATHERS: Dialogue with Trypho, Chapters 69-88 (Justin Martyr)

6a. https://youtu.be/z9nPc_q0L0M?si=eMQkp4_KymNgvz2E&t=1202

7. Malachi Martin

8. Theological Propaedeutic; Philip Schaff 1893; p.394

Chapter Seven: "Modern Versions and Bible Prophecy"

a. The LXX Septuagint Fallacy is one of the biggest scams to ever be poured out upon Christendom. The Septuagint Fallacy: An Indictment of Modern Criticism (Classic Reprint): Phillips, W. I.: 9781332240586: Amazon.com: Books

1. [Part 8] Understanding Bible Prophecy and a Mid-Tribulation Rapture at Paul's 'last trump.'

1a. The Day Of Christ vs. The Day Of the Lord

2. The Greek New Testament According To Family 35, Wilbur N. Pickering

2a. More information on this variant available here: Novum Testamentum graece : Tischendorf, Constantin von, 1815-1874

2b. The Mid-Tribulational Rapture of the Church: Find out more in this undisputed and rare case for a Mid-Tribulational Rapture by: Hollner, Michael G

3. CHURCH FATHERS: Against Heresies, III.10 (St. Irenaeus) (newadvent.org)

4. In my view, no matter how it is explained away, the NIV is still in error in Zechariah 6:6. West means to the West, and North is to the North.

5. Discussions and explanations amongst some commentators can be seen here: https://biblehub.com/commentaries/ezekiel/39-2.htm . One may claim that the issue is primarily with interpretation/translation, not text, but nevertheless, the omission is still there, and a major prophetic prediction is missing from Ezekiel 39:2 in the modern versions.

6. Herman Hoskier says that the Harklean Syriac (c. 616 AD) contains “of them which are saved.” https://archive.org/details/Hoskier-ConcerningTheTextOfTheApokalypse/page/610/mode/2up . This reading is also found in the commentary of Andreas of Caesarea (c. 611 AD). It is also the reading of manuscripts 2917, 2814, 2186, 254, 2028, 2029, and 2044 (links all within here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1svgs1sat-DMu-mV1ZqEUnmZgkgg7loEoKfYejWDnUIM/edit?usp=sharing)

Chapter Eight: "Modern Versions and Poetry"

a. The NKJV is considered a 'gateway drug' with subtle attempts to introduce the reader to the critical science and lead them into the 'harder stuff' of modern critical versions. The Real Reason They Made the NKJV

b. Scholars will often claim that the differences in the modern texts and the KJV is only less than 1% or so which is very dishonest. Modern versions have thousands of missing words that are found in the KJV. The NIV version alone has 55,168 less words than the King James Bible and many major doctrines are attacked in all the critical versions by omissions of Holy Scripture (Rev 22:18-19) KJV.

1. The King James Bible uses the word Unicorn several times. Isn't that a mythical creature?

2. KJV 1611 - The Authorized King James Bible

2a. Creation Theory: Unicorns are Rhinos

Chapter Nine: "Words/Evidence/Questions"

1. Magisterium | Catholic Answers Magazine

1a.. Rome: Sola Ecclesia, not Sola Scriptura – The Reformed Reader

2. The Revision Revised by John Burgon

2a. Scholars will use the argument of silence, but when there is evidence, they remain silent. Such is the case of the church father witnesses to disputed passages such as the PA in John 7:53-8:11. Ambrose of Milan 340-397 AD (Epistle 26): “The acquittal of the woman who, in the Gospel of John, was brought to Christ accused of adultery, is very famous.” (See also Ambrose's Epistle 74.) Jerome 342-347 AD (Against the Pelagians 2:17): "In the Gospel according to John, there is found, in many of the Greek, as well as the Latin copies, the story of the adulteress who was accused before the Lord.” (In smaller words: Jerome affirms specifically that the PA was in many Greek copies of the Gospel of John, and that the PA was in many Latin copies of the Gospel of John."

2b. Oxyrhynchus - New World Encyclopedia

2c. Sir. Frederic G. Kenyon (1863-1952)

2d. Handbook to the textual criticism of the New Testament : Kenyon, Frederic

2e. Bruce M. Metzger, The Early Versions of The New Testament. Their Origin, Transmission, And Limitations

2ee. The Text Of The Church? -- By: Kurt Aland

2f. Wilbur Pickering on Kurt Aland's 'The Text of the Church'

2g. Seth, an Egyptian 'god of confusion' Oxyrhynchus was an ancient city dedicated to worship of the god Seth of where the majority of papyri originated.

2gg. https://kjvdebate.com/blog/f/the-modern-scholars-homemade-criteria-box

2h. James White on Problems with John 6:15 and 1 John 5:7-8

2i. Our 3 books on the KJV and I John 5:7!

2j. New Age Movement - Dr. Walter Martin
3. The NASB committee realized their blunder of omitting 'all men' in their NASB95 and put 'all people' back in their NASB20 due to TR, Byz, Sinaiticus, C, D, F, G, latt, sy, co, and P46 support. This is yet another example (among hundreds) of the inconsistencies in modern textual criticism.

4. https://youtu.be/hLv23TwmyE8

5. Luke 23:38

5a. Acts 2:30 CNTR

6. IS THE KJV THE ONLY REAL TRANSLATION? JAMES WHITE VS D.A. WAITE

7. New Testament Greek

7a. The "Errors" in the King James Bible - Bible Baptist Bookstore (kjv1611.org)

7b. THE WORDS OF GOD: KJB or Modern Bibles?

7c. Theodore P. Letis: Is the King James Bible too hard to read?

8. The Language of the KJV - KJV Today

8a. KJV Preface (blueletterbible.org)

8b. Is the (KJV) Too Hard to Understand?

9. https://youtu.be/zljgCcG0yXw with another analysis by Eclectic James Snapp: https://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2017/08/michael-brown-and-elephant-in-room.html

9a. Why We Should Not Passover Easter

10. Another view here: intro to the Quartodeciman controversy in the early church: https://www.gci.org/articles/the-passover-easter-quartodeciman-controversy/

11. In depth information on Revelation 8:13: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fgZVs42r0YfTt9x5ZAhdMPm6CVtX2jknsEzmUX00mBw/edit?usp=sharing

12. https://www.amazon.com/Gods-Secretaries-Making-James-Bible/dp/0060838736

13. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hx5A9d52v94

13a. Billy Graham Sits Down With Johnny on Carson Tonight Show - 06/13/1973 - YouTube

13b. Ronald Reagan on the Authorized King James Bible - YouTube

14. KJB Textual Technology (kjvtextualtechnology.com)

Chapter Ten: "The Two Big Lies"

1. The Text and Canon Conference from 2019 with Pastor Truelove and Dr. Riddle contains valuable info on the proper theological, historical, evidential, and analytical approach to the issue of text and translation: https://www.textandtranslation.org/text-and-canon-conference-2019/

2. https://www.biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/gtj/12-1_021.pdf

2a. The Byzantine text-type and New Testament textual criticism : Sturz, Harry

3. The Majority Text and the Original Text: Are They Identical?

3a. Dean John William Burgon - The Revision Revised p.283 online

4. The Origin of the Byzantine Text

See also KJB Textual Technology

4a. Erasmus and the Vatican Codex | The Puritan Board

5. Palæoromaica, or historical and philological disquisitions

6. Erasmian Myths: Codex Vaticanus - Confessional Bibliology

7. https://purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/ira-rabin-the-cancelled-tests-of-2015.717/

7a. Whites debate over the T.R. with Dr. Kleeck at 1:55:01.

8. Life and Letters of Fenton John Anthony Hort

8a. Rebuttal to James Snapp's shorter ending theory at Matthew 25:13

9. Page 5 (and 567) with its source: https://byzantinetext.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/editions-rp-11-appendix.pdf

10. I John 5:7 debate with Old Latin/Italic Manuscript Evidence! THE SCHOLAR'S DON'T ADVERTISE THIS!

Chapter Eleven: "The Manuscript Vault"

a. David Martin: French Theologian: ‘The Genuineness of the Text of I John 5:7,' 1722, P. 157.

b. This chapter is a pioneering effort by the author not seen in many titles. In evaluating the manuscript evidence, it is evident that text critical decisions are often made in advance according to ideology, presuppositions, and a bias against the Byz/TR text form. The inconsistencies in textual criticism are extensive with hundreds of examples.

1. Neither Oldest Nor Best: David H Sorenson

2. Who is the Morning star Jesus or Satan? - Follow In Truth

3. When it comes to reconstructing ancient papyri such as p64 and others, it is obvious a lot of guess work and speculation is involved, and often times decisions are made as long as they contradict the KJV reading or the Byz/TR Greek text.

4. https://youtu.be/8zodZOHYwE0?si=EI-Wa4D1kJkhW_fD&t=4581

Chapter Twelve: "Golden Nuggets & Foreign Translations"

a. The KJV and Foreign Translations!

1. Tischendorf's Big Mistake

2. This video from the BBC shows how white and pristine the pages of Codex Sinaiticus look. The pages of my 40-year-old King James Bible look older than this fraudulent document. Watch and judge for yourselves if this is truly a 4th century (AD 350) document or not. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00dy1gc

2a. Westcott & Hort: their heresies and occult activities (sociedadrvg.com)

2b. B.F. Westcott: Father of Modern Bibles, Lost in Doubt

3. https://www.amazon.com/New-Age-Bible-Versions-Documentation/dp/0963584502/

4. https://www.valera1602.org/

4a. The Spanish Bible - Which one should I use?

4b. Is Gail Riplinger right about the RVG Spanish Bible?

5. https://www.amazon.com/Nouveau-Testament-King-James-Francaise/dp/1541100263

5a. Global Bible Translations

6. https://www.baptistboard.com/

6a. The Myth of Verbatim Identicality:

6aa. Did The King James Translators View Their Work As Perfect? | False Friends & The Prefaces To The AV - YouTube

7. https://textusreceptusbibles.com/

7a. Thomas Ross vs James White KJV-LSB Debate Slides TR.pptx - Google Slides

7aa. The Difference Between Translation Vs Transliteration (tomedes.com)

7b. When whales were fish — Lateral Magazine

7c. The Text of the Gospels: Against KJV-Onlyism: Stop Usurping the Original Text James does not understand Bible maps relating to Antioch and mixes up being KJVO with T.R. only. The claim that the KJV can correct the Greek & the Hebrew does not refer to the originals (which are now forever dust in the wind), but rather the KJV has demonstrated correcting many Greek and Hebrew texts as seen in these 100 examples.

7d. Can a translation of God's word be perfect?

8. https://www.amazon.com/Revision-Revised-Dean-William-Burgon/dp/1888328010/

9. http://www.bible-researcher.com/wessex-gospels.html

10. Herman C. Hoskier (1864-1938)

11. Codex B and its allies - a study and an indictment - VOL 1 - (1914) by Professor Hoskier : Hoskier, Westcott, Hort, Burgon, Riplinger, Hunt, Lindsey,

Chapter Thirteen: "The Apologetic Dog and Pony Shows"

1. Today's apologetics is a far cry from how it used to be decades ago. https://www.amazon.com/Seduction-Christianity-Spiritual-Discernment-Last/dp/1928660843

2. It seems commonplace today for some of these apologetic shows to drink beer, smoke cigars, and do shots of whisky in their warmups before attacking the KJV Bible. See here at the 2:55 mark.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdZlXW9XaQI

2a. Postmillennialism and a Cigar with Jeff

3. Contact Dr. Ed for the specific episode of the arguments he made against the KJV. https://christiandefense.org/

4. KJV critics often times resort to the 'The Argument of Silence' fallacy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_silence

4a. Beza and Revelation 16:5 - KJV Today

4b. Commentary on the Apocalypse (dbpedia.org)

5. https://www.amazon.com/Revelation-16-Final-Triadic-Declaration/dp/1733331581

6. Revelation 16:5 - Revelation 14:5 | Pure Bible Forum

7. Beza and Revelation 16:5

Chapter Fourteen: "The Septuagint Fallacy"

1. Any true Christian who understands 'good doctrine' (Pro 4:2) will reject the heretical teachings in the Apocrypha books and know they are not inspired. https://www.blueletterbible.org/faq/don_stewart/don_stewart_395.cfm

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerhard_Kittel

3. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/002200947701200309

3a. Hazardous Materials : Free Download chapter 27

4. THE LXX - A Model of Reverse Engineering

5. Josephus: Antiquities of the Jews, Book X

6. An Exposition of the Epistle to the Hebrews Final words on "The Septuagint Fallacy" coming from some old timers, preachers born in the late 20's to 40's. Before the 1960's (when the KJB was for the most part the only Bible around, as in KJV Only), and before most of the modern versions came to market, you would hardly ever hear anybody complaining about the fact that when the N.T. apostles were preaching, they did not quote the O.T. Scriptures verbatim, or exactly word for word. So what? It matters not. The Holy Ghost inspired the NT Apostles to quote from the OT and nowhere is there a rule (nor in scripture), that says it has to be verbatim, or word for word. The NT quotes enhance our learning, and it is the Holy Ghost that enhances Old Testament verses with New Testament verses. That is like saying Stephen should have quoted verbatim the 60 verses in Acts chapter 7 from the Old Testament. It's called preaching. Many of the NT writers were inspired and anointed to preach and teach from the Old Testament. Even when Jesus quoted or even read out of the Old Testament, such as in Isaiah or in Deuteronomy, sometimes He quoted verbatim, and sometimes He did not. So what? That's what preachers do; they preach and go all over the place, especially if they are anointed!

6a. EXERCITATIONS ON THE EPISTLE TO THE HEBREWS

7. Jots & Tittles 16: White and Wilson on the LXX and "Inspired Editing" - YouTube

Chapter Fifteen: "The Oxford vs. Cambridge Fallacy"

1. In 1852 the American Bible Society wrote Committee on Versions to the Board of Managers. In 1858 a second report was written, Report of the Committee on Versions to the Board of Managers of the American Bible Society. This information can be found in Dr. Thomas Holland's book, 'Crowned with Glory: The Bible from Ancient Text to the Authorized Version', p. 101.

2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_Bible Printing errors (typos) did happen in the printings of the King James Bible. Throughout the history of Bible publishing there have been some rather humorous examples of printing errors. Here are a few of the printing errors that have occurred in various King James Bible editions.

The printer of the "Fool Bible" had to pay 3,000 pounds for this mistake in Psalm 14:1: "The fool hath said in his heart there is a God."

In 1637 there was "the Religious bible" so named because it read in Jeremiah 4:17 "Because she hath been RELIGIOUS (rebellious) against me, saith the LORD."

In 1653, there was a misprint in I Corinthians 6:9 that read, "Know ye not that the unrighteous shall inherit the kingdom of God" and one in Romans 6:13 that read, "Neither yield ye your members as instruments of righteousness unto sin." This Bible became known as "the Unrighteous Bible."

In 1716 an Irish edition contains a tiny but significant typo. In John 5:14 it read "sin on more" rather than "sin no more." No one noticed the error until 8000 copies had been printed.

In 1717, there was a misprint in a heading for the "parable of the vineyard," which called it the "Parable of the VINEGAR." This Bible was called "the Vinegar Bible." These printing errors were soon caught and corrected. (Will Kinney). Modern scholars and KJV Bible critics attempt to compare these funny printing errors to their own omissions and changes in modern Bibles such as changing "God" to a 'he,' a 'who,' or a 'he who' is he in I Tim 3:16 (KJV). There is a big difference in typos compared to TEXT changes, and we know it!

3. Mr. Rick Norris is drawn to the originals only Heresy' and you can learn more about his views at https://kjvdebate.com/blog/f/infomercial-the-bound-and-unfound-original-scriptures

4. While some KJB Bible believers hold to the Oxford vs. Cambridge fallacy thinking they are doing the Church a service, what they are unaware of is the fruits of this divisive teaching. It brings confusion to many believers in Christ and has many more concerned about finding the right and so-called only 'pure' KJV Bible rather than just going out and buying a KJV Bible. The Church is already confused on this issue, one does not need to throw fuel into the already burning fire (I Cor 14:33).

5. Westminster Theological Seminary - Westminster Confession (wts.edu)

Chapter Sixteen: "A Fair Warning"

1. As of the original publishing of this title in 2018, this prediction by the author (to the best of our knowledge) is unique worldwide and proclaimed by faith alone.

2. The 'Bride of Christ' will rule with Christ for 1000 years!

3. Scholars and Bible critics cannot comprehend the fact that God is quite able and powerful enough to inspire a translation such as the KJV, especially if that was what His plan was all along throughout the ages.

4. One of the reasons that some readers believe that this title takes an adversarial approach towards the reader is that not many titles about the KJV Bible look into and examine the words of the prophets and the warnings therein.

5. Not a single verse in the Bible points to any of the early church or the disciples in the 1st century traveling to Egypt and authoring the original manuscripts.

6. The KJVO debate and all things related to doctrine all comes down to faith and what you believe in. You either have faith in the science of textual criticism or you have faith in God's promises, His power, and in His divine providence. The same God that was able to inspire His Word is well able to also preserve it throughout all generations, even in a translation (Psa 12:6-7) KJV.

7. This author filled with compassion, got on his knees and wept in prayer before the Lord for James White and many others who attack the KJV Bible.

8. https://www.sooperarticles.com/spirituality-articles/religion-articles/azusa-street-prophecy-990971.html

9. One common argument by Bible critics & scholars is in saying, "Where in the KJV Bible does it say that the KJV will be the only perfect and inspired translation."? Response: "Where in the O.T. does it specifically say that His name will be Jesus."? Better yet, perhaps critics should listen to the millions of living epistles worldwide who proclaim by the Spirit that "if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them" (Isa 8:20; II Cor 3:1-18; I John 4:6) KJV. This is a fallacy called an 'argument of silence.' God is not spoken of one time in the book of Esther! Does this mean God does not exist or was not involved in working through Esther? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_silence

9a. The translators to the reader : preface to the King James version 1611 :

10. Has your faith been imparted and are you ready to receive this end-time prophetic message regarding God's Holy Word from the Lord? (Hab 2:1-4) KJV.

Conclusion:

“The King James Bible is the Word of God. The greatest thing that any preacher could ever do for himself would be to quit worrying about it. Just use it. Quit trying to second-guess what it says. Quit throwing it aside every time a contradiction seems to appear. Moses approached the burning bush because it was a contradiction. It was clearly on fire, but it was not consumed. He didn’t walk away in frustration. Instead, he drew closer and found the depths of God. To the Bible student who has accepted the King James Bible, contradictions are an invitation. They are not evidence of a weak Bible. They are evidence of the student’s ignorance. Like the burning bush, the inexplicable draws us to take a closer look. While others run to lexicons and commentaries, the Bible believer prays and searches deeper. God reveals himself in those searches.” John M. Asquith, Further Thoughts on the Word of God, p.124

SCROLL DOWN FOR ERASMUS SOURCES!

Click the Book and get your new copy today!

I John 5:7 and the 1st Century Latin/Spain Connection

End-notes with live video links and sources....

END-NOTES for "I John 5:7 and the 1st Century Latin/Spain Connection" 'Paul's Vision for Spain'

BUY BOOK HERE! We also need your support to continue full-time in the ministry. Please GIVE here.

Currently all sources are in our BLOG HERE but are being transferred to this endnote page. Thank you for your patience during this very time consuming process.

As in all our titles, the complexity of these sources and having so many rabbit holes to go down could take months. But what information we have now needs to get out now, even in knowing that this title will need another whole chapter in time. This drives me to go back down these research holes several times over until I reach a comfort zone of certainty. But full-time ministry is needed and soon to be expected. You can also help with that as the Lord leads at kjvdebate.com/give. Whenever a pioneering work is done such as some of our work is, some corrections may occur along the way, especially when some information is not available anywhere online and is only attainable the old school way by going down to the bottom floor of a University Library for an oversized untranslated work in the Latin not yet printed in English. The deeper this research goes, the more we are finding out that there is simply no information online but rather in a rare book somewhere in a library and often very far away from us. So I thank you ahead of time for your participation if that is something you would be interested in. We hope this title blesses you with some brand-new information, Amen and Amen!

You can give as the Lord leads. I am seeking God that He will grant this author a door back into full time ministry to labor for the Lord. The additional information we have will require another full chapter of content and sources. The book’s info is powerful and I thank you for your patience as we labor to add another future chapter aside from what is already in it. We hope you enjoy the color photos. I pray this title blesses you, in Jesus name. Amen!

Chapter One: 'I John 5:7 and the 1st Century Latin/Spain Connection'

a. Clement of Rome (35-100 AD)

b. First Clement: Clement of Rome

c. The Muratorian Fragment (c. 170-200)

d. Garcia Villoslada, Ricardo (dir.) Historia De La Iglesia En España Vol. I. La Iglesia En La España Romana Y Visigoda [1979]: Ricardo García Villoslada

1. Samuel Berger (1843-1900)

2. AN OLD-LATIN TEXT OF THE CATHOLIC EPISTLES

3. Nestle - Eberhard Nestle 1904 Greek New Testament

4. Eberhard Nestle (1851-1913)

5. Introduction to the textual criticism of the Greek New Testament : Nestle, Eberhard, 1851-1913

6. The Historical Defense of 1 John 5: 7-8: The Unjustly Exscinded Text of the Three Divine Witnesses: Michael Maynard, (1991)

7. Center for New Testament Restoration