Book Sources and Endnotes
Endnotes with live links....
ENDNOTES for 'The King James Only Debate: Can you Trust the Modern Scholars'?
LIVE ONLINE ENDNOTES! This book has the unique feature of providing all sources and endnotes within an online platform by offering live verifiable links right here. This title is truly the first book to offer such an experience. Let this book come alive for you with just the click of your mouse to enhance your learning on this great topic. These live endnotes are extensive and if you find a statement that lacks a source, or you believe any source is in need of correction, please detail your reasoning and contact us via email at https://kjvdebate.com/contact
These live endnotes are very important sources, and enhance the context with a needed clarity to this topic!
Introduction
1. II Timothy 4:14; I Timothy 1:20; II Timothy 2:17 (KJV).
1a. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PSV72Tjy8g&t=1s
3. Dean John William Burgon, “The Revision Revised: A Refutation of Westcott and Hort’s False Greek Text and Theory” (1883); (p. XV).
4. https://store.kjv1611.org/the-scholarship-only-controversy/
5.https://www.babbel.com/en/magazine/how-many-people-speak-hebrew; and https://www.babbel.com/en/magazine/how-many-people-speak-greek
6. https://www.str.org/w/remember-that-first-century-mark-fragment-
7. Chris Pinto’s ‘Bridge to Babylon’ series on Amazon.com. https://www.amazon.com/Bridge-Babylon-Rome-Ecumenism-Bible/dp/B01LQ9WA2O/
8. https://ehrmanblog.org/finally-now-we-know-the-first-century-copy-of-mark/
9. Dr. Daniel Wallace’s reconstruction of Mark 8:22 https://danielbwallace.com/2020/09/01/new-discoveries-on-every-page-p45-p46-p47/
10. Dr. James White vs. Dr. Jeff Riddle on the debate over the reading in Ephesians 3:9 Oct 3, 2020. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q05oQTiTfe4
10a. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gxf_EhjZd5Y
10b. See pages 330-332; 415.
10c. https://brandplucked.webs.com/theesv.htm
11. ‘Is the World’s Oldest Bible a fake’? David Daniels: Sept 15, 2020, Chick Publications. https://www.amazon.com/Worlds-Oldest-Bible-Fake/dp/075891170X
12. Steven Avery has documentation regarding this controversy. Steven Avery | Pure Bible Forum
13. ibid., p. 18. Endnote #10 above.
14. ‘The Bride of Christ’ at https://kjvdebate.com/blog/f/the-bride-of-christ
15. Laurence Vance: ‘King James, His Bible, and it’s Translators’ (2016, pp.261-269). https://www.amazon.com/King-James-His-Bible-Translators/dp/0996786902
16. Texe Marrs during his radio show interviewing Dr. Peter Ruckman at the 35:00 mark; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3rt9p_EqF3k
Chapter One: "The King James Advantage"
1. During my two years at Valley Forge Christian College in 1984-1985, the KJV Bible was demoted in favor of all the modern versions, and the teachings from the Bible were very light and shallow.
2. One example of Muslim’s propping up Dr. James White’s own arguments can be seen here at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GYkPn2aXKds
3. Unfortunately, this is where it is all heading, and modern versions of the Bible are a big part of it. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2PSV72Tjy8g
4. Kautzsch, E. Gesenius’ Hebrew Grammar 2ndEd. Oxford: Clarendon Press, p.440 1909-1910
4a. Knowing in your heart the truth about the King James Bible is not a textual issue but rather a spiritual issue of which faith and discernment is the primary ingredient. This is not saying we are better than anyone else or have a 'holier than thou' attitude. We are simply saying we know the truth about this from God's Word itself and none other (p.182). One must ask an honest question here. When you hear the scholars and the critics say that 'no translation can be perfect, for only the originals are faithful,' we must ask of whom did they hear this from, God or man? If from God, then where specifically in Scripture did God warn and foretell us that no translation can be preserved perfect in our generation? If from man, then who or what Seminary or Bible College taught you this?
5. I was unable to find the specific dividing line episode on YouTube with this statement, but the reader may be able to verify which series Dr. White made this comment to me personally via live chat through Twitter as he was live on the dividing line segment.
Chapter Two: "Missing Verses and Words"
1. Whenever you hear a scholar or a Bible critic say, “I want to know what the Apostles wrote,” it is because they do not believe that there is any perfect Bible in the world today that says exactly ‘what the Apostles wrote.’ KJV Bible believers by faith know exactly ‘what the Apostles wrote’ (Romans 15:4) KJV.
1a. Charles Darwin's 'On the Origin of Species' was published on November 24th, 1859, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/On_the_Origin_of_Species right along the same time Tischendorf was shown Codex Sinaiticus on a 3rd visit to Saint Catherine's Monastery in the Sinai Peninsula. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Sinaiticus
2. See also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Codex_Bezae
3. https://cudl.lib.cam.ac.uk/view/MS-NN-00002-00041/1
4. Isaiah 30:20-21 (KJV).
5. https://www.laparola.net/greco/index.php
6. https://answersingenesis.org/church/already-gone/
7. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bIC3RjQVQro
8. https://www.christianpost.com/news/father-and-son-removed-from-bible-translations-for-muslims.html
8a. https://uasvbible.org/2022/01/18/why-do-we-not-need-the-original-bible-manuscripts/
9.https://www.monergism.com/thethreshold/sdg/warfield/Sermons_and_Essays_from_the_Works_of_B_-_B_B_Warf.pdf (p.2072).
Chapter Three: "Attacks on Doctrine"
1. Jesus said “Ye shall know them by their fruits” (Matthew 7:15-20) KJV. Any man or ministry must produce the good fruits of faith and belief in the Word of God rather than doubts, questions, and unbelief (Hebrews 11:1-7; I Timothy 1:4) KJV.
2. Nick Sayers video teaching at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=knrI2UvOlHI
3. Dr. Edward Hills at https://confessionalbibliology.com/2016/04/01/defense-of-the-pericope-by-dr-edward-freer-hills/
4. https://banneroftruth.org/us/store/theauthor/alexander-j-a/ Bible Scholar, Dr. J. A. Alexander (24 April 1809 – 28 January 1860), in his commentaries on Acts (2 vols. Acts 8:37-38 pp.349-350).
5. The original manuscripts were produced in Antioch and all the cities of which the Apostle Paul traveled, not anywhere in Egypt. "And the disciples were called Christians first in Antioch" (Acts 11:26) KJV.
7. Should 1 John 5:7 be in the Bible? - YouTube John Ankerberg interview with Dr. Daniel Wallace.
8. Is 1 John 5:7 as it is worded in the KJV correct? - Follow In Truth (Jeffery Khoo, Kept Pure in All Ages, 2001, p.88).
9. Textual Critic Elijah Hixon's' webpage for January of 2020. Click 'older posts' at the bottom of the page for the January 7th, 2020 blog. Evangelical Textual Criticism: January 2020
11. https://www.tertullian.org/fathers/jerome_preface_gospels.htm
12. https://media.sabda.org/alkitab-8/LIBRARY/WLK_ABVI.PDF p.26
13. Jacobus, Catholic and Protestant Bibles Compared, p. 200, Note 15.
14. https://textusreceptusbibles.com/Editorial/Umlauts
15. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/050701.htm Cyprian clearly said “AGAIN it is written” as he quoted verbatim the Comma (Illustration #49 in this title, p.115). Source: Translated by Robert Ernest Wallis. From Ante-Nicene Fathers, Vol. 5. Edited by Alexander Roberts, James Donaldson, and A. Cleveland Coxe. (Buffalo, NY: Christian Literature Publishing Co., 1886.)
16. Dr. Stephen Boyce is a follower of Dr. James White. Although these men are well intentioned, we recommend Bible believers avoid such men who cast doubts and raise questions upon the Word of God (Rom 16:17) KJV. https://citylightseattle.com/meet-the-team/stephen-boyce/
16a. See for yourself of over 1500 years of witnesses and testimony to I John 5:7 in the KJV. https://www.academia.edu/81925237/The_Witness_of_God_is_Greater_by_Mike_Ferrando_June_2022
17. https://www.amazon.com/inquiry-into-integrity-Greek-Vulgate/dp/1175340154
18. https://www.goodreads.com/book/show/575374.Victor_of_Vita
19. http://www.gnosis.org/naghamm/apocjn.html
20. https://www.amazon.com/Plea-Authenticity-Three-Heavenly-Witnesses/dp/046937246X
21. The readings of the modern versions are so absurd that even James White (The King James Only Controversy p.207ff or p.261ff in the 2009 revision), who is certainly no friend of the Traditional Received Text nor of the Authorized Version, admits that "there is much to be said in defense of the KJV rendering," and that he "prefer[s] this reading, and feel[s] that it has more than sufficient support among the Greek manuscripts.” However, Dr. White's views do change from time to time (along with all the modern versions), so we are not sure what he believes on this verse in the year 2022. https://www.amazon.com/King-James-Only-Controversy-Translations/dp/0764206052
Chapter Four: "Answering the Critics"
1. https://www.youtube.com/user/CAnswersTV/featured
2. https://w3techs.com/technologies/history_overview/content_language/ms/y (English has continued to climb since this chart was created)
3. https://www.languagecomparison.com/en/how-many-people-speak-greek-and-hebrew/comparison-20-35-7 (13 million Greek speakers and 9 million Hebrew speakers as of June 2022)
4. Although I do not agree with this authors views on the Cambridge vs. Oxford fallacy, a total list of spelling updates is available here: https://www.bibleprotector.com/400yearsKJBeditions.pdf
5. For a discussion on the Acts 12:4 controversy: https://youtu.be/R_rtLmClXmg
6. In this link you will find James Snapp explain his views but fails to mention that Beza corrected the reading to 'her.' https://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2022/04/luke-222-his-or-their.html
7. Dr. Stephen Boyce said this either in this link in his debate with Dr. Jeff Riddle on May 19, 2020, or within another debate with Josh Gibbs or Jonathan Shefield. https://youtu.be/-RkxlW9cP0U?t=1975 Contact Dr. Boyce for the exact location during his debate.
8. A brief review of her book: https://youtu.be/g3eXVIa5lLk
9. You will not find any mention of Vatican authority in authoring the modern versions in the NA28, but it is located in the NA27 on p.45 seen here https://brandplucked.webs.com/theesv.htm and then search the NA28 below.... https://drive.google.com/file/d/1U3IUZsIuklf7UnkxUcUmKiN_OytGI2HU/view
10. Footnote 9 on page xv: https://www.gutenberg.org/files/36722/36722-h/36722-h.html
11. https://textusreceptusbibles.com/Based_on_Few_Manuscripts as an introduction. Erika Rummel’s 1986 book Erasmus' Annotations on the New Testament records the following on pages 41-42, "Clearly Erasmus consulted a respectable number of Greek manuscripts over the years. While he based the Greek text of his first edition on manuscripts readily available in Basel and hastily corrected for the printer, the Annotations incorporated the result of collations done earlier during his stay in England. Moreover, Erasmus did not rest content with these findings but, in the years following the publication of his first edition, personally visited a number of libraries, obtained manuscripts on loan, consulted the Aldine and Complutensian editions, and had variants recorded for him by his friends. The copious additions to the Annotations bear witness to his continued research." She later says on pages 120-121, "In their judgment of Erasmus as a textual critic in modern strollers usually adapt a patronizing attitude: his efforts are laudable but do not measure up to the standards of modern textual criticism. The implication is that he fell short of these standards in two respects: he used only a very few manuscripts to establish the text and he preceded haphazardly, make an ad hoc decisions. Erasmus did, over the course of five additions, consult a respectable number of manuscripts, although it is true that he was not well equipped to judge their relative age and value. Moreover, his decisions were based on sound principles. Although he expressly stated only the principle of the lectio difficilior, he consistently applied a full range of criteria. Indeed, he pointed out that certain errors 'usually happened' or 'happened all the time' – expressions the amount to a statement of principle. On the whole Erasmus provided the kind of intelligent and common Sense textual criticism that stands up well to contemporary methods. Where Erasmus does deserve criticism and indeed fall short of contemporary standards is in the area of documentation. This applies not only to references – or the lack of them – in the published notes, but also, one suspects, to his private record-keeping. He gathered materials and many places and over a number of years, jotting down on schedae, scraps of paper, so that he himself was often overwhelmed by the mountain of unstructured evidence he had collected and was unable to verify what he had read and where he had read it; moreover, at the time of the printing he was rushed and in poor health. These circumstances and a distaste for proofreading kept him from checking the printers' copy conscientiously. In accordance with the practices of his time he did not bother to cite his sources consistently or accurately, although he was induced to add precise references to later editions to counter the attacks of opponents questioning his integrity. In sum, Erasmus successfully overcame the handicaps of his own time – the lack of a philological tradition into difficulties associated with obtaining manuscripts – but he did not overcome his personal (rather pardonable) shortcomings: an impetuous style of composition and an impatience to see his work in print."
12. See these resources for more information on the issue of the last 6 verses of Revelation: http://textus-receptus.com/wiki/Revelation_22:16-21 and https://textusreceptusbibles.com/Revelation_Textus_Receptus and https://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2019/02/erasmus-manuscript-of-revelation.html
13. LXX info: https://brandplucked.webs.com/nolxx.htm
14. https://www.ccel.org/bible/kjv/preface/pref10.htm
Chapter Five: "Inspiration and Preservation"
1. Dr. White is unable to name any verse that is beyond potential future changes of modern textual criticism in his debate with Dr. Jeff Riddle on October 3, 2020: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q05oQTiTfe4&t=3900s
2. Since the initial publication of this book in 2018, Dr. White has converted to postmillennialism. He shares his reasoning here: https://www.aomin.org/aoblog/exegesis/max-lucados-apology-for-having-spoken-the-truth-ravi-zacharias-scandal-and-yes-mildred-hes-a-postmillennialist/ at the 1:13:15 mark and following. As such, and in fairness to Dr. White, much of what is said on this page is no longer up to date as of 06/22 since he now takes a firmer stance on eschatology and emphasizes its importance.
3. Codex Vaticanus has as a filler manuscript (GA 1957 from ~15th century: https://digi.vatlib.it/view/MSS_Vat.gr.1209 beginning on page 1519) for the rest of Hebrews and all of Revelation. But nevertheless, it still claims to be a 4th century manuscript of which does not contain the book of Revelation among other missing books. Look here http://www.1611kingjamesbible.com/codex_vaticanus.html/
4. https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=1john.5|version=VarApp&options=GNHVU
5. https://youtu.be/dZgUnuBCh3E
6. John 6:15 information: https://www.stepbible.org/?q=reference=john.6|version=VarApp&options=GNHVU and https://archive.org/details/novumtestamentu01greggoog/page/n840/mode/2up?view=theater
7. https://youtu.be/tbJ33bxBnWA
8. https://www.textandtranslation.org/confessional-bibliology-roundtable-john-118-son-or-god/
9. https://www.aomin.org/aoblog/king-james-onlyism/vaccines-lindsay-kjv-onlyism-roman-catholic-apologetics-arguments/ beginning at 15:00
10. The Byzantine Text-type and New Testament Textual Criticism (1984) by Harry A. Sturz. https://www.amazon.com/Byzantine-Text-Type-Testament-Textual-Criticism/dp/1631998064
11. Original quotes on pages 21-22 from this: https://www.biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/gtj/12-1_021.pdf . An analysis of Dr. Wallace’s view is found here: https://youngtextlessreformed.com/2020/01/06/yes-the-bible-teaches-preservation/
Chapter Six: "The 'Originals only' Heresy"
1. https://uasvbible.org/2022/01/18/why-do-we-not-need-the-original-bible-manuscripts/
2. https://thekingsbible.com/Bible/23/34
3. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/050701.htm
4. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/050672.htm
5. https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/0128.htm
6. Although the majority position of the early church was some form of literal chiliasm, Justin Martyr in his dialogue with Trypho (1.80) says, “I admitted to you formerly, that I and many others are of this opinion, and [believe] that such will take place, as you assuredly are aware; but, on the other hand, I signified to you that many who belong to the pure and pious faith, and are true Christians, think otherwise.” https://www.newadvent.org/fathers/01286.htm
Chapter Seven: "Modern Versions and Bible Prophecy"
1. Such a perspective is iterated more fully here: https://www.lesfeldickbiblestudy.com/501-the-day-christ-vs-the-day-of-the-lord/
2. More information on this variant available here: https://archive.org/details/novumtestamentu02abbogoog/page/n799/mode/2up?view=theater
3. https://www.stepbible.org/?q=version=VarApp|version=THOT|reference=Mark.1&options=GNHVU
4. In my view, no matter how it is explained, the NIV is still in error in Zechariah 6:6. Nevertheless, Bob Utley says on this, “The Hebrew text has the term (BDB 29) "after them" or "following them." This means the black and white horses would go the same direction. It is possible to understand the PREPOSITION in v. 6 as "beside," implying another direction (i.e. west) or "the region of the west" or "toward the sea," which seems to fit the context of "four" representing the entire known world.” https://bible.org/seriespage/zechariah-6 . Nevertheless, this is a minority view and a snippet of certain commentators agreeing with “after them” rather than “west” is seen here: https://biblehub.com/commentaries/zechariah/6-6.htm
5. Discussions and explanations amongst some commentators can be seen here: https://biblehub.com/commentaries/ezekiel/39-2.htm . One may claim that the issue is primarily with interpretation/translation, not text, but nevertheless, the omission is still there, and a major prophetic prediction is missing from Ezekiel 39:2 in the modern versions.
6. Herman Hoskier says that the Harklean Syriac (c. 616 AD) contains “of them which are saved.” https://archive.org/details/Hoskier-ConcerningTheTextOfTheApokalypse/page/610/mode/2up . This reading is also found in the commentary of Andreas of Caesarea (c. 611 AD) available here: https://corpus.ulaval.ca/jspui/bitstream/20.500.11794/19560/1/25095.pdf . It is also the reading of manuscripts 2917, 2814, 2186, 254, 2028, 2029, and 2044 (links all within here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1svgs1sat-DMu-mV1ZqEUnmZgkgg7loEoKfYejWDnUIM/edit?usp=sharing)
Chapter Eight: "Modern Versions and Poetry"
1. https://thekingsbible.com/Bible/23/34
2. http://textus-receptus.com/wiki/Unicorn
Chapter Nine: "Words/Evidence/Questions"
1. https://www.catholic.com/magazine/print-edition/magisterium
2. https://reformedreader.wordpress.com/2013/03/22/rome-sola-ecclesia-not-sola-scriptura/
3. https://www.stepbible.org/?q=version=VarApp|version=THOT|reference=Eph.3&options=GNHVU
4. https://youtu.be/hLv23TwmyE8
6. https://youtu.be/-fWbJH-LRSc?t=1837
7. https://www.laparola.net/greco/index.php
8. https://www.av1611.org/kjv/kjv_easy.html . Alternative perspective offered here: https://byfaithweunderstand.com/2015/02/23/the-reading-level-of-the-kjv/
9. https://youtu.be/zljgCcG0yXw with another analysis by Eclectic James Snapp: https://www.thetextofthegospels.com/2017/08/michael-brown-and-elephant-in-room.html
10. Another point of view can be seen here with a brief introduction to the Quartodeciman controversy in the early church: https://www.gci.org/articles/the-passover-easter-quartodeciman-controversy/
11. In depth information on Revelation 8:13: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fgZVs42r0YfTt9x5ZAhdMPm6CVtX2jknsEzmUX00mBw/edit?usp=sharing
12. https://www.amazon.com/Gods-Secretaries-Making-James-Bible/dp/0060838736
13. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Hx5A9d52v94
Chapter Ten: "The Two Big Lies"
1. The Text and Canon Conference from 2019 with Pastor Robert Truelove and Dr. Jeff Riddle contains invaluable information on the proper theological, historical, evidential, and analytical approach to the issue of text and translation: https://www.textandtranslation.org/text-and-canon-conference-2019/
2. https://www.biblicalstudies.org.uk/pdf/gtj/12-1_021.pdf
3. https://bible.org/article/majority-text-and-original-text-are-they-identical
4. https://christianpublishinghouse.co/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/the-origin-of-the-byzantine-text-the-new-perspective.pdf (pages 6-7, with the source)
5. Another source can be seen here at............ https://www.google.com/books/edition/Pal%C3%A6oromaica_or_historical_and_philolog/dZNhAAAAcAAJ?hl=en&gbpv=1&dq=erasmus+and+codex+vaticanus+%221439%22&pg=PA523&printsec=frontcover
6. Another view can be seen here at https://confessionalbibliology.com/2016/05/16/erasmian-myths-codex-vaticanus/
7. https://purebibleforum.com/index.php?threads/ira-rabin-the-cancelled-tests-of-2015.717/
8. Who and what is the vile one here... .https://www.google.com/books/edition/Life_and_Letters_of_Fenton_John_Anthony/Rxc3AAAAMAAJ?q=&gbpv=1&bsq=vile%20textus%20receptus#f=false
9. Page 5 (and 567) in here with its source: https://byzantinetext.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/11/editions-rp-11-appendix.pdf
Chapter Eleven: "The Manuscript Vault"
1. This chapter is not of need of any endnotes, for each page contains the sources and actual manuscript evidence that is also available in full color in pdf form after the book purchase. Click here to get your free color pdf file. https://kjvdebate.com/free-pdf-1
Chapter Twelve: "Golden Nuggets & Foreign Translations"
1. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xe_ZzKym5X8
2. This video from the BBC shows how white and pristine the pages of Codex Sinaiticus look. The pages of my 40-year-old King James Bible look older than this fraudulent document. Watch and judge for yourselves if this is truly a 4th century (AD 350) document or not. https://www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/p00dy1gc
3. https://www.amazon.com/New-Age-Bible-Versions-Documentation/dp/0963584502/
4. https://www.valera1602.org/
5. https://www.amazon.com/Nouveau-Testament-King-James-Francaise/dp/1541100263
6. https://www.baptistboard.com/
7. https://textusreceptusbibles.com/
8. https://www.amazon.com/Revision-Revised-Dean-William-Burgon/dp/1888328010/
9. http://www.bible-researcher.com/wessex-gospels.html
Chapter Thirteen: "The Apologetic Dog and Pony Shows"
1. Today's apologetics is a far cry from how it used to be decades ago. https://www.amazon.com/Seduction-Christianity-Spiritual-Discernment-Last/dp/1928660843
2. It seems commonplace today for these dog and pony apologetic shows to drink beer, smoke cigars, and do shots of whisky in their warmups before attacking the KJV Bible. See for yourself here at the 2:55 mark.... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mdZlXW9XaQI
3. Contact Dr. Ed for the specific episode of the recorded arguments he made against the KJV. https://christiandefense.org/
4. KJV critics often times resort the 'The Argument of Silence' fallacy. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_silence
5. https://www.amazon.com/Revelation-16-Final-Triadic-Declaration/dp/1733331581
Chapter Fourteen: "The Septuagint Fallacy"
1. Any true Christian who understands 'good doctrine' (Proverbs 4:2) KJV will reject the heretical teachings in the Apocrypha books and know they are not inspired, nor canon. https://www.blueletterbible.org/faq/don_stewart/don_stewart_395.cfm
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gerhard_Kittel
3. https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/002200947701200309
4. http://textus-receptus.com/wiki/Article:The_LXX_-_A_Model_of_Reverse_Engineering_by_Scott_Jones
5. https://penelope.uchicago.edu/josephus/ant-10.html
6. https://www.forgottenbooks.com/en/books/AnExpositionoftheEpistletotheHebrews_10051846
Chapter Fifteen: "The Oxford vs. Cambridge Fallacy"
1. In 1852 the American Bible Society wrote Committee on Versions to the Board of Managers. In 1858 a second report was written, Report of the Committee on Versions to the Board of Managers of the American Bible Society. This information can be found in Dr. Thomas Holland's book, 'Crowned with Glory: The Bible from Ancient Text to the Authorized Version', p. 101.
2. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wicked_Bible
3. Mr. Rick Norris is drawn to the 'Originals only Heresy' and you can learn more about his views at https://kjvdebate.com/blog/f/infomercial-the-bound-and-unfound-original-scriptures
4. While some KJB Bible believers hold to the Oxford vs. Cambridge fallacy thinking they are doing the Church a service, what they are unaware of is the fruits of this divisive teaching. It brings confusion to many believers in Christ and has many more concerned about finding the right and so-called only 'pure' KJV Bible rather than just going out and buying a KJV Bible. There is already enough evil and confusion in this world and in the Church, one does not need to throw fuel into the already burning fires of confusion (I Corinthians 14:33) KJV.
Chapter Sixteen: "A Fair Warning"
1. As of the original publishing of this title in 2018, this prediction by the author (to the best of our knowledge) is unique worldwide and proclaimed by faith alone.
2. https://kjvdebate.com/blog/f/the-bride-of-christ
3. Scholars and Bible critics cannot comprehend the fact that God is quite able and powerful enough to inspire a translation such as the KJV, especially if that was what His plan was all along throughout the ages.
4. One of the reasons that some readers believe that this title takes an adversarial approach towards the reader is that not many titles about the KJV Bible look into and examine the words of the prophets and the warnings therein.
5. Not a single verse in the Bible points to any of the early church or the disciples in the 1st century traveling to Egypt and authoring the original manuscripts.
6. The KJVO debate and all things related to doctrine all comes down to faith and what you believe in. You either have faith in the science of textual criticism or you have faith in God's promises, His power, and in His divine providence. The same God that was able to inspire His Word is well able to also preserve it throughout all generations, even in a translation (Psalms 12:6-7) KJV.
7. This author, in all due honesty and filled with compassion, got on his knees and wept in prayer before the Lord for Dr. James White and many others who attack the KJV Bible.
9. One of the favorite arguments by Bible critics and scholars is in saying, "Where in the KJV Bible does it say that the KJV will be the only perfect and inspired translation."? My response is, "Where in the Old Testament Bible does it specifically say that His name will be Jesus."? Better yet, perhaps the critics should listen to the millions of living epistles worldwide who proclaim by the Spirit that "if they speak not according to this word, it is because there is no light in them" (Isaiah 8:20; II Corinthians 3:1-18; I John 4:6) KJV. This argument is a fallacy called an 'argument of silence.' God Himself or our 'Lord' is not spoken of one time in the book of Esther! Does this mean God does not exist or was not involved in working through Esther? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_silence
10. Has your faith been imparted and are you ready to receive this end-time prophetic message regarding God's Holy Word from the Lord?
